Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Biology: Synthesis, Nano–Bio Interactions, Biomedical Applications, Toxicity and Future Perspectives

Authors

  • Rajasekhar Chikati Department of Biochemistry, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh–516005

Keywords:

Nanoparticles, nanobiotechnology, nanomedicine, biological synthesis, protein corona, drug delivery, nanotoxicology

Abstract

Nanoparticles have emerged as versatile platforms at the interface of materials science and biology because their small dimensions, high surface-area-to-volume ratio, tunable surface chemistry and size-dependent optical, magnetic and electronic properties permit interactions with biomolecules and cells that are difficult to achieve with bulk materials. This review summarizes the state of knowledge available through December 2012 on the classification and synthesis of biologically relevant nanoparticles, their interactions with biological systems, major biomedical applications, and the principal concerns surrounding biocompatibility and safety. Metallic, metal-oxide, magnetic, polymeric, lipid-based and semiconductor nanoparticles are discussed together with conventional physicochemical fabrication and biological or “green” synthesis using microorganisms and other biological systems. Particular attention is given to the nano–bio interface. In physiological fluids, nanoparticles rapidly adsorb proteins and other biomolecules, forming a corona that can alter their biological identity, cellular uptake, biodistribution, targeting and toxicity. Biomedical applications include drug and gene delivery, cancer therapy, diagnostic imaging, biosensing, magnetic separation and combined diagnostic–therapeutic approaches. Despite substantial promise, translation is constrained by variable physicochemical properties, aggregation, dose-dependent toxicity, oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, uncertain long-term fate, manufacturing reproducibility and the need for standardized characterization and risk assessment. The evidence available by 2012 indicates that biological performance cannot be predicted from composition alone; size, shape, surface charge, coating, dose, exposure route and the surrounding biological environment must be considered together. Future progress therefore depends on reproducible synthesis, rigorous nano–bio characterization and safety-by-design strategies that integrate therapeutic performance with biocompatibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ferrari M. Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2005;5:161–171.

Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2009;3(1):16–20.

Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annual Review of Medicine. 2012;63:185–198.

Doane TL, Burda C. The unique role of nanoparticles in nanomedicine: imaging, drug delivery and therapy. Chemical Society Reviews. 2012;41:2885–2911.

Elsaesser A, Howard CV. Toxicology of nanoparticles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012;64(2):129–137.

Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, et al. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2005;2:8.

Li X, Xu H, Chen ZS, Chen G. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles by microorganisms and their applications. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2011;2011:270974.

Dhillon GS, Brar SK, Kaur S, Verma M. Green approach for nanoparticle biosynthesis by fungi: current trends and applications. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2012;32(1):49–73.

Monopoli MP, Åberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nature Nanotechnology. 2012;7:779–786.

Walkey CD, Chan WCW. Understanding and controlling the interaction of nanomaterials with proteins in a physiological environment. Chemical Society Reviews. 2012;41:2780–2799.

Sharifi S, Behzadi S, Laurent S, Forrest ML, Stroeve P, Mahmoudi M. Toxicity of nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews. 2012;41:2323–2343.

Desai N. Challenges in development of nanoparticle-based therapeutics. AAPS Journal. 2012;14:282–295.

Koo OM, Rubinstein I, Onyuksel H. Role of nanotechnology in targeted drug delivery and imaging: a concise review. Nanomedicine. 2005;1(3):193–212.

Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nature Nanotechnology. 2007;2:751–760.

Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface. Nature Materials. 2009;8:543–557.

Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WCW. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2012;14:1–16.

Kiran GS, Selvin J, Manilal A, Sujith S. Biosurfactants as green stabilizers for the biological synthesis of nanoparticles. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2011;31(4):354–364.

Casals E, Puntes VF. Inorganic nanoparticle biomolecular corona: formation, evolution and biological impact. Nanomedicine. 2012;7(12):1917–1930.

Published

20-06-2022

How to Cite

Chikati, R. (2022). Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Biology: Synthesis, Nano–Bio Interactions, Biomedical Applications, Toxicity and Future Perspectives. International Journal of Current Innovations in Advanced Research, 5(2), 1–6. Retrieved from https://ijciar.com/index.php/journal/article/view/220

Issue

Section

Review Articles