A Historical Re-Examination of Customary Arbitration and the Administration of Justice in Nigeria

Osadola Oluwakemisola Ifedapo; Osadola Oluwaseun Samuel

Authors

Osadola Oluwakemisola Ifedapo Department of Private Law, Federal University Oye, Oye Ekiti, Nigeria
Osadola Oluwaseun Samuel Ph.D. Candidate, Department of History and International Studies, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria

Keywords:

Customary Arbitration, Administration, Justice, Nigeria

Abstract

As a phenomenon, dispute has become an integral part of human existence, and dispute resolution has also become an essential requirement for peaceful co-existence of members of a given society. It provides opportunity for the examination of alternative pay-offs in a situation of positioned disagreements, and restores normalcy in a society by facilitating discussions and placing parties in dispute institutions in which they can choose alternative positive decision to resolve differences. Dispute exists on many different levels including international, intra-group, inter-group, interpersonal, and intrapersonal. It does also exist in relation to different subject matters namely, ideational or beliefs, values, material resources, emotions, roles and responsibilities. Dispute varies in terms of the social contexts in which they are located, and the traditional societies had always found solution to such conflicts by way of arbitration, subject to the native Laws and Customs of the particular society, with a view to engendering social harmony and equilibrium. This paper thus examines the role of customary arbitration in the administration of justice in Nigeria, putting into consideration the historical origin and relationships therein. The paper however derives it strength from both primary and secondary materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

2 NWLR, 1988 pt. 90 pg 563

2 NWLR, 1992, pt. 221 pg 7

3 ECSLR, 1973, pg 90

3 NWLR, 1991, pt. 180 pg 385

4 NWLR, 1988, pt.90 pg 554

5 NWLR, 1991, pt. 191 pg 296

6 NWLR, 1991, pt. 708 pg 12

8 NWLR, 1991, pt.209 pg 317

Abinabina V. Enyimadu

All NLR, 1961, 304. The Supreme Court also adopted the definition in Zaiden vs. Mohssen (1973) 11 SC 1 and Kindley vs. Military Governor of Gongola State (1988) 2 NWLR (Pt 77) 445 p.

Allot, A.N. 1960. Essays in African Law. London: Butterworth, pg 126.

Assamong V. Amuaku, 1932. IWACA pg. 192

By Restatement we mean the collection and systematic arrangement of customary laws.

Cap 2 Laws of Ebonyi State, 2009.

Cap 3 Laws of Ebonyi State, 2009.

Cap. E14 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2010.

Devlin, P. cited in Black’s Law Dictionary, Op.cit. p.313. It is noted here that aside of the Statutes of General Application, English case law which had built up as judicial precedent had direct application in Nigeria before independence and became persuasive authority in Nigerian Courts after independence till date.

ECSLR, 1972, 2 pg 90

Eugen Ehrlich, 1936. Fundamental Principles of Sociology of laws. London: Harvard Univ. Press.

Ezediaro, E. 1971. Guarantee and Foreign Investment in Nigeria (1971) 5 International Law 770 @ 775 qtd in Ibrahim Iman. The Legal Regime of Customary Arbitration in Nigeria. Unpublished Paper.

Fathy, H.M. Arbitration According to Islamic Law. Arab Arbitration Journal 1. Qtd in Oluwafemin A Ladapo “Where does Islamic Arbitration fit into Judicially Recognized Ingredients of Customary Arbitration in the Nigerian Jurisprudence” Unpublished Paper.

Foli V. Akese

FSC, 1957, 2, pg 29

FWLR, 2003. (Pt.157)1013 at 1038

Gadzama, J.K. 2004. Inception of ADR and Arbitration in Nigeria. NBA Conference paper, Abuja, 2004.

Garner, B.A. Ed. 2009. Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th Edition, Minesota: West Publishing Co, 443 p.

Holmes, W. 2013. The Path of the Law. In: Nwocha, M.E. (Ed.), Human Rights and Criminal Justice in Nigeria. Abakaliki, CE Darrolls Publishers.

Kolajo, A.A. 2001. Customary Law in Nigeria through the Cases. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Ltd.

Kwasi V. Larbe

NSCOR, 2008,34 1325.

NSCQR, 2009, 35, 570.

NSCQR, 2010, 41, 955.

Per Niki Tobi J.S.C.

Section 17 of the Evidence Act, Cap. E14 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2010.

Section 258 (1) Evidence Act, 2011. The definition was restated in Okafor vs. Okafor (2005) 2 SMC 416 ratio 5. Section 2 of the Ebonyi State Customary Court Law CAP. 47 Laws of Ebonyi State, 2009, defines customary law as a rule or body of customary rules regulating rights and imposing correlative duties being customary rules which obtain and are fortified by established usage and which are appropriate and applicable to any particularcause, matter, dispute, issue or question.

See for instance the Age of Marriage Law, CAP 9 Laws of Ebonyi State, 2009.

See for instance the Arbitration Law Cap 14 Laws of Ebonyi State, 2009; the Arbitration Law of Lagos State, and the Arbitration Act applicable throughout the Federation of Nigeria.

See Njoku v Ekeocha and Anor (1972) 2 ECSLR 199; Mgbagbu v. Agochukwu (1993) 3 ECSLR (Pt.1) 90; Ofomata v Anoka (1974) 4 ECSLR 251; Ojibah v Ojibah (1991) 22 NSCC (Pt.2) 130; Ohiaeri v. Akabeze (1992) 23 NCC (Pt.1) 139; Nkado v. Obiano (1993) 4 NWLR 6; Igbokwe v. Nlemchi (1996) 2 NWLR (Pt.429) 185.

Supra, 313 p.

Supra, at 1357 p.

Surah 4:35 (The Noble Qur‟an)

The Igbo is one of an estimated one hundred native tribes in Nigeria but one of the three largest ones, the other two being the Hausa and the Yoruba. The Ekpuke Eto; Ekpuke Essa, and Ndichie Traditional Councils each constitute a distinct Traditional Arbitral Panel. Ekpuke refers to Council and Eto refers to three. In the same token Ekpuke Essa is a native panel made of seven age grades where Essa refers to seven. Ndi Ichie refers to the Council of Elders.

The repugnancy test has been examined in detail earlier in the work.

Umoh, P.U. 2013. Law in African Context, cited in M. E. Nwocha (2013). Human Rights and Criminal Justice in Nigeria .Abakaliki, C.E. Darrolls Publishers.

WACA, 1932. pg 192

Walter S.N. and Onnoghen J.S.C.