Performance of Pre-Service Teachers and Client Satisfaction in Public Schools
Keywords:
demonstration teaching, outstanding, descriptive-correlationalAbstract
This study aimed to determine the level of performance of the Bachelor of Elementary Education pre-service teachers of the University of Northern Philippines in their final demonstration teaching and the level of satisfaction of the clients with the overall teaching performance of the pre-service teachers. The study used the descriptive-correlational method of research and survey method was used to gather all the data needed in the investigation. It found out that the overall performance of the student teachers is “outstanding” and the clients are “very much” satisfied with the BEED teaching interns. The researcher recommend that there needs to still give the pre-service teachers a pre-deployment seminar-workshop to enhance more their capability along practice teaching.
Downloads
References
Brown, N.R. 2009. What can you learn in three minutes? Campus–Wide Information Systems, 26(5): 345–354.
Cook, L. 2007. When in Rome: Influences on Special Education Student-Teachers' Teaching. International Journal of Special Education, 22(3): 118-130.
Enz, B.J. and Cook, S.J. 1992. Student Teachers' and Cooperating Teachers' Perspectives of Mentoring Functions: Harmony or Dissonance?. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, April 20-24, 1992). Eric Documents Reproduction Service, No ED 350-291.
Fwimann-Nemer, S. and Buchmann, M. 1987. When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and teacher education, 3(4): 255-273.
Goodlad, J.I. 1994. Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, PO Box 44305, San Francisco, CA 94144-4305.
Higher Education Council. 1998. Faculty-School Partnership. [Fakulte okul isbirligi] YOK/World Bank National Education Development Project Preservice Teacher Education. Ankara, Turkey: YOK.
Higher Education Council. 2007. Teacher preparation and faculty of education [Öğretmen yetiştirme ve eğitim fakülteleri] (1998-2007). Ankara, Ankara, Turkey: YOK.
Koerner, M., Rust, F.O.C. and Baumgartner, F. 2002. Exploring roles in student teaching placements. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2): 35-58.
Montgomery, B. 2000. The student and cooperating teacher relationship. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 18(2): 7-15.
Moores, D. 2001. Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles and practices. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Phillips, T.M. and Baggett-McMinn, S. 2000. Southeastern Selection Criteria For Cooperating Teachers. Education, 121(1): 177-185.
Ronfeldt, M. and Reininger, M. 2012. More or better student teaching?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8): 1091-1106.
Smith, J.P. 1991. Cooperating teachers. Music Educator Journal, 78: 250-30.
Tannehill, D. and Goc-Karp, G. 1992. The student teaching practicum: Placement trends and issues. Physical Educator, 49(1): 39.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
